AI Decision Models: How They Differ from LLMs
Decision models have recently gained attention as a different approach to AI. One of the more talked about ones is Jev from TypeSafe AI. Jev produces structured choices, scores, and confidence estimates rather than text.
While traditional AI models have made predictions and classifications for years, Jev focuses on making structured decisions that software can use directly. This approach offers another way to build AI applications, especially when a system needs to evaluate information and choose what happens next.
How does Jev work?
With a traditional LLM, you send a prompt and receive generated text. Even when you ask for JSON, the application must handle the response and validate its contents before using it.
Jev works differently. You provide some context, define the questions you want answered, and specify the expected answer type. Jev returns structured results that your application can process directly.
Jev supports three main question types:
- Choice: Selects an option from a list you define, such as billing, technical support, or sales.
- Score: Rates something against an ordered scale, such as low, medium, or high priority.
- Yes or no: Estimates the probability that a statement is true, such as whether a support ticket needs human attention.
You can ask several questions about the same input in one request. For example, a support application could classify a ticket, rate its urgency, and estimate whether a human should review it. Jev returns the results in a structured format so the application can decide what to do next.
Decision models vs. LLMs
LLMs and decision models serve different purposes. An LLM can explain a decision, generate content, write code, or reason through a complex task. Jev is designed for focused decisions with defined outputs.
| Feature | LLMs | Jev |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Generate and understand language | Produce structured decisions |
| Output | Text or structured data | Choices, scores, and probabilities |
| Answer format | Can be open-ended | Defined by the questions you provide |
| Typical uses | Coding, research, writing, reasoning | Classification, routing, scoring, decision support |
The distinction is not that LLMs cannot make decisions. They can also classify information and return structured data. Jev is built specifically around that task, without generating a free-form response that an application must interpret.
This can make it useful for repeated, well-defined decisions. For tasks that require detailed explanations, creative output, or complex multi-step reasoning, an LLM remains the more suitable tool.
What are confidence scores?
One of Jev's main features is that its outputs include probabilities and confidence information. These values help developers assess how strongly the model favors an answer.
For example, a customer support application might ask whether a ticket should be escalated. If the model indicates a high probability that escalation is needed, the application could send the ticket to a senior support team. If the result is uncertain, it could send the ticket for human review.
However, confidence does not guarantee correctness. A model can be highly confident and still make the wrong decision. Developers should test its results against real examples and choose thresholds that suit the consequences of each decision.
It is also important to distinguish the probability of an answer from a separate confidence score. The exact meaning depends on the output type. Applications should follow the model's documentation rather than treating every returned number as the same measurement.
Where can decision models be useful?
Classification and routing
Many applications need to sort incoming information before processing it. A support platform might classify requests by topic and send them to the right team. A business application could categorize documents, emails, or customer feedback.
Jev can return a category from a predefined list, allowing the application to route the item without parsing a generated paragraph.
Scoring and evaluation
Decision models can also evaluate information against a defined scale. For example, an application could rate a support ticket by urgency, score a document for relevance, or assess whether a response meets specific criteria.
The results can be used to rank items, prioritize work, or identify cases that need further review. The quality of these decisions still depends on the model and how well the criteria describe the task.
AI agents and tool selection
AI agents use models to decide which actions to take. An agent might choose a tool, classify a request, or determine whether a task needs additional information.
A general-purpose LLM can make these decisions as part of its reasoning. A decision model can handle a narrower choice before the agent acts.
For example, a custom workflow using Hermes Agent could use Jev to classify an incoming task before passing it to the agent. It could also help determine which workflow should handle a request. This would require a custom integration rather than relying on assumed native support.
Decision models should not be treated as security controls on their own. If an agent can execute commands or modify files, permissions and deterministic rules must enforce which actions are allowed. A model's classification can inform that process, but should not replace it.
Alternatives to Jev
Jev is part of a broader type of models designed to produce structured decisions. OpenJev and Laya are two other projects worth exploring when comparing approaches.
OpenJev
OpenJev is an open project related to the Jev approach. It is worth examining if you want to explore an implementation outside a hosted service. Before using it, check its current availability, hardware requirements, supported features, and license.
Laya
Laya is an open-source decision model from Convai Innovations. It focuses on tasks such as choosing from predefined options, rating information, and answering yes-or-no questions. It may be relevant if you want to evaluate a model that can be run in your own environment.
These projects should be compared on actual performance, not just their stated capabilities. Use the same test data and measure accuracy, latency, resource requirements, and how well their confidence estimates match real outcomes.
Can you run decision models locally?
Running a model locally gives you more control over the software environment and where data is processed. However, the available deployment options differ by project. Jev is offered through an API, while open-source alternatives may provide options for running inference on your own hardware.
Hardware requirements depend on model size, memory use, and throughput. Some models can run on a CPU, while others benefit from a GPU, especially when processing many requests.
If you want to experiment with local AI models, DaDesktop provides cloud desktops with dedicated GPU options. You can use them for development and testing without buying a high-end GPU for your local computer.
Learn more about running local LLMs or explore AI agent environments.
When should you use a decision model?
Decision models are useful when an application needs a defined answer that can trigger a specific next step. They can complement LLMs by handling classification, scoring, and routing while a generative model handles language and more complex reasoning.
The best choice depends on your application. Test the model against your own data, compare it with conventional classifiers and LLMs, and measure accuracy, latency, and cost. For important decisions, include human review and safeguards where needed.
Want to talk about your use case? Contact us and we'll point you in the right direction.