6 videos 📅 2025-03-19 09:00:00 America/Bahia_Banderas
1:38
2025-03-19 13:02:19
5:09
2025-03-20 09:04:50
1:01:32
2025-03-20 09:32:49
4:31
2025-03-20 09:35:15
31:01
2025-03-20 10:19:57
17:34
2025-03-20 15:02:37

Course recordings on DaDesktop for Training platform

Visit NobleProg websites for related course

Visit outline: Agile Software Testing (Course code: agilesofttest)

Categories: Scrum · Software Testing

Summary

Overview

The session appears to be a brief, informal course or training wrap-up with minimal instructional content. The majority of the transcript consists of acknowledgments (“Thank you”) and scattered, non-instructional remarks. A single substantive question is raised regarding documentation during testing processes, but no detailed response or teaching content is provided. The session lacks structured learning objectives, technical explanations, or demonstrable workflows.

Topic (Timeline)

1. Unstructured Interactions and Wrap-up [00:00:25 - 00:17:33]

  • Early timestamps contain fragmented, non-instructional dialogue (e.g., “get these people out of my way,” “Who is she?”), suggesting possible off-mic interactions or ambient noise.
  • At 00:03:25, a participant asks: “Is the name of the chuleta relevant? Why did you put it like that?” — implying prior reference to a “chuleta” (Spanish slang for a cheat sheet or quick reference guide), but no explanation is given.
  • At 00:08:18, a participant asks whether documentation is advisable during testing processes; no substantive answer or guidance is provided.
  • The remainder of the transcript consists of repeated “Thank you” utterances from multiple participants, spaced irregularly, indicating a closing or acknowledgment phase with no further content delivery.

Appendix

Open Questions

  • What is the intended purpose or context of the term “chuleta” in the course material?
  • What documentation standards, if any, are recommended for testing processes?

Notes

  • No tools, commands, workflows, or principles are taught or demonstrated.
  • No speaker roles are identifiable beyond a single named participant (“Bernardo”) at 00:03:58.
  • The session lacks pedagogical structure and appears to be an incomplete or poorly recorded segment.